Congress' social media hearing was a ‘stupid’ sideshow

Tuesday marked another chapter in the "Tech Companies go to Congress" story, with Facebook, Twitter and YouTube testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. The hearing, titled "Examining the Content Filtering Practices of Social Media Giants," was supposed to shed light on how these companies are keeping their sites safe for users by filtering out toxic content. But, instead, we learned very little. Executives from Facebook, Twi tter and YouTube simply echoed what they've been saying in other congressional hearings since 2017. They talked about how they're using a combination of artificial intelligence and human reviewers to fight fake news, bots and toxic content like hate speech.

Those are efforts we were already aware of, though we did find out out that Facebook, apparently, can't decide when it should ban offensive pages like InfoWars. But the fact that the latest hearing was another wasted opportunity, just like Mark Zuckerberg's appearance before Congress in April, isn't completely Facebook, Twitter or YouTube's fault.

Throughout yesterday's session, US House Representatives from both sides of the aisle seemed to be more interested on their personal agenda. Republicans like Rep. Smith (TX) talked about how he felt conservatives were being censored, accusing Google of blocking his searches for "Jesus, Chick-fil-A and the Catholic religion." Democrats, on the other hand, said the committee should be having hearings on Russian election interference and Trump's relationship with Vladimir Putin instead. "This committee needs to proceed with hearings involving the question of the Russian intrusion and stealing of the 2016 election," Rep. Lee (D-CA) said. "And I've come to a conclusion now that it was truly stolen. Dealing with these engines that have been effective for the United States on that issue seems to be a stretch and inappropriate."

Facebook, Twitter, And Google Executives Testify To House Judiciary Committee On Content Filtering Practices

Rep. Lieu (D-CA) went as far as calling the hearing "dumb" and "stupid," saying there were more important issues the House Judiciary Committee should be focusing on. "I served on active duty in the US military, I never thought I would see the American Commander-in-Chief deliver the talking points of the Kremlin. Are we having a hearing on that? No." he said. "As we sit here today there [are] nearly three thousand babies and kids ripped away from their parents by the Trump administration, they have not been reunified yet. Are we having a hearing on that? No." Instead, he added, "we're having this ridiculous hearing on the content of speech of private sector companies. It's stupid because there's this thing called the First Amendment -- we can't regulate content. The only thing worse than an Alex Jones video is the government trying to tell Google not to do it, to prevent people from watching [it]. "

Meanwhile, Chairman Goodlatte (R-VA) asked Facebook, Twitter and YouTube why the shouldn't be regulated as non-utilities like hotels or clubs, which at a certain point have a legal liability for how consumers use their services. Goodlatte's concern is that these social media giants aren't often held accountable for content that causes harm on their sites, including hate speech and the spread of misinformation. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, tech companies are shielded from liability for content posted by their users, though they do have an obligation to remove things like child pornography.

Demonstrators during the House Judiciary Committee hearing on social media filtering practices.

But talks of regulating Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other social media apps aren't anything new. We heard similar chatter from members of the House and Senate during the Diamond and Silk hearing in April and before that when Zuckerberg testified. And yet nothing has changed. As Rep. Lieu pointed out during the hearing, the House Judiciary Committee itself can't write any legislation, but its members can. So, if Congress really wanted to get serious about regulation, it could take similar steps to those the European Union has. The EU has exercised more authority over them with laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which gives users more control of their private information, and by posting hefty fines on companies such as Google for being too powerful.

Congress could easily do something similar. After all, Republicans have control of every branch of the US government, and based on Chairman Goodlatte's statement they seem to be the ones keen to have more oversight of Facebook, Twitter and Google. This is an interesting position because it counters Republican and conservatives principles, which generally tend to lean toward not enforcing regulations for businesses. But until that happens, these social media congressional hearings will continue to be nothing more than a way for members of Congress to score some political points.

For now, it seems like all they're doing is pretending to care about the fake news and bullying on the internet, without actually taking any action.

Images: Getty



via Engadget RSS Feed https://ift.tt/2zSan4a
RSS Feed

If New feed item from http://www.engadget.com/rss-full.xml, then send me

IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evernote cuts staff as user growth stalls

Image
Note-taking app Evernote has fallen on hard times of late, culminating in its latest spate of job cuts impacting 15 percent of its workforce (54 employees). CEO Chris O' Neil -- an ex-Googler who took the reins in 2015 -- announced the firings at an all-hands meeting earlier today, reports TechCrunch . In a message on the Evernote blog , O' Neill admitted he'd set "incredibly aggressive goals" for the company in 2018. He continued: "Going forward, we are streamlining certain functions, like sales, so we can continue to speed up and scale others, like product development and engineering." The layoffs follow an exec exodus just weeks ago and the company's recent brand refresh (complete with a refined logo and wordmark). But critics are more concerned about its product, especially the free tier, which they claim lacks the perks to...
Read more

The best air conditioner

Image
By Liam McCabe This post was done in partnership with Wirecutter . When readers choose to buy Wirecutter's independently chosen editorial picks, it may earn affiliate commissions that support its work. Read the full article here . After six summers of researching, testing, and recommending window air conditioners, we've learned that quiet and affordable ACs make most people the happiest—and we think the LG LW8016ER will fit the bill in most rooms. This 8,000 Btu unit cools as efficiently and effectively as any model with an equal Btu rating, and runs at a lower volume and deeper pitch than others at this price. Little extra features like a fresh-air vent, two-axis fan blades, and a removable drain plug help set it apart, too. The LG LW8016ER is a top choice for an office or den, and some people will find it quiet enough for a bedroom, too. If our main pic...
Read more

We won't see a 'universal' vape oil cartridge anytime soon

Image
Pre-loaded cartridges of cannabis concentrate are currently among the most popular means of consumption, and for good reason. They're discreet to use and easy to handle, a far cry from the dark days of 2016 when we had to dribble hash oil or load wax into narrow-mouthed vape pens by hand. But, frustratingly, an ever increasing number of oil cartridge manufacturers employ one-off design standards so that their products won't work with those of their competitors, thereby locking customers into proprietary ecosystems. We've already seen this with nicotine vaporizers -- which has a seen a massive rise in "pod systems" in the last few years, each outfitted with a unique canister and battery built to be incompatible with those of their competition. Is it too late for the burgeoning cannabis industry to set a universal standard for their product designs? ...
Read more