Apple raised the price of its best phone by $330, and no one cares

The trend over the last few years is clear: iPhone sales are slowing down. Apple wasn't going to be able to achieve huge sales growth forever, and until the company makes inroads in India or strengthens its position in China, Apple is looking for other ways to keep revenue on the rise. Perhaps the most obvious way to do that is to raise the price of an iPhone -- and over the last two years, Apple has successfully made buying its latest and greatest phones significantly more expensive.

If you can, cast your mind back to the heady days of 2016. The brand-new iPhone 7 cost $649 for the base 32GB of storage, while the bigger iPhone 7 Plus came in at $769. The extra cash bought you the larger screen as well as noticeably better battery life and a dual-camera system capable of all sorts of nice photography tricks. As always, you could spend more to get more storage, but less than $800 got you Apple's latest and greatest smartphone -- significantly less if you didn't want a giant screen.

My, how times have changed.

Last year's $999 iPhone X started the process of shaking up Apple's pricing structure. The phone was positioned as the bleeding edge, beyond what you got from a standard flagship iPhone in terms of design. If you wanted the "standard" iPhone updates, Apple had you covered with the $699 / $799 iPhone 8 / 8 Plus -- more expensive than the previous model, but not wildly so.

But this year, Apple unsurprisingly decided the iPhone X design was the way of the future. So, Apple didn't release an iPhone 8S or some other update on the standard. Instead, the company announced the $749 iPhone Xr, a phone that shares the design and many of the features of the iPhone X, but cuts a few corners to achieve a more palatable price.

Indeed, yesterday people were buzzing that the iPhone Xr offered almost everything notable about the iPhone X. It has the edge-to-edge display, Face ID and a portrait mode-capable camera (even if it doesn't have dual lenses). It also includes the powerful new A12 processor that Apple put in the new iPhone Xs and Xs Max. For most customers, the compromises (LCD rather than OLED display, one camera instead of two, aluminum edge instead of stainless steel) won't matter nearly as much as the $250 savings.

Two years ago, a brand-new flagship Apple smartphone started at $650. Now, the a compromised version of Apple's vision will set you back $750. Even though the Xr will likely be more than enough iPhone for most customers, the iPhone X proved that there are loads of people out there willing to pay $999 and up for a truly premium device.

And this year, those with lots of money have even more opportunity to spend: the iPhone Xs Max starts at $1,099 and goes up to an insane $1,449 with 512GB of storage. In 2016, the top-of-the-line iPhone 7 Plus with 256GB of storage cost $929. Not only has Apple raised the cost of a flagship device, it expanded the pricing window for its highest-end phones by more than $500.

That's pretty remarkable, and it'll help keep Apple's revenues growing even if iPhone sales don't increase in terms of pure numbers. In fact, it's already working: the iPhone's average selling price increased to $724 in the last quarter, up from only $606 the year before. Now, Apple is in an even better position to keep that number moving up. That's great for investors, but not so much for customers, who now have to spend at least $1,000 for Apple's latest and greatest. Or $750 to get a taste of what the best iPhone is like.



via Engadget RSS Feed https://ift.tt/2OjMqpl
RSS Feed

If New feed item from http://www.engadget.com/rss-full.xml, then send me


Unsubscribe from these notifications or sign in to manage your Email Applets.

IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evernote cuts staff as user growth stalls

Image
Note-taking app Evernote has fallen on hard times of late, culminating in its latest spate of job cuts impacting 15 percent of its workforce (54 employees). CEO Chris O' Neil -- an ex-Googler who took the reins in 2015 -- announced the firings at an all-hands meeting earlier today, reports TechCrunch . In a message on the Evernote blog , O' Neill admitted he'd set "incredibly aggressive goals" for the company in 2018. He continued: "Going forward, we are streamlining certain functions, like sales, so we can continue to speed up and scale others, like product development and engineering." The layoffs follow an exec exodus just weeks ago and the company's recent brand refresh (complete with a refined logo and wordmark). But critics are more concerned about its product, especially the free tier, which they claim lacks the perks to
Read more

The best air conditioner

Image
By Liam McCabe This post was done in partnership with Wirecutter . When readers choose to buy Wirecutter's independently chosen editorial picks, it may earn affiliate commissions that support its work. Read the full article here . After six summers of researching, testing, and recommending window air conditioners, we've learned that quiet and affordable ACs make most people the happiest—and we think the LG LW8016ER will fit the bill in most rooms. This 8,000 Btu unit cools as efficiently and effectively as any model with an equal Btu rating, and runs at a lower volume and deeper pitch than others at this price. Little extra features like a fresh-air vent, two-axis fan blades, and a removable drain plug help set it apart, too. The LG LW8016ER is a top choice for an office or den, and some people will find it quiet enough for a bedroom, too. If our main pic
Read more

We won't see a 'universal' vape oil cartridge anytime soon

Image
Pre-loaded cartridges of cannabis concentrate are currently among the most popular means of consumption, and for good reason. They're discreet to use and easy to handle, a far cry from the dark days of 2016 when we had to dribble hash oil or load wax into narrow-mouthed vape pens by hand. But, frustratingly, an ever increasing number of oil cartridge manufacturers employ one-off design standards so that their products won't work with those of their competitors, thereby locking customers into proprietary ecosystems. We've already seen this with nicotine vaporizers -- which has a seen a massive rise in "pod systems" in the last few years, each outfitted with a unique canister and battery built to be incompatible with those of their competition. Is it too late for the burgeoning cannabis industry to set a universal standard for their product designs?
Read more