Getting Started with StorMagic SvSAN – A Product Review


Getting Started with StorMagic SvSAN - A Product Review

Recently, I had the opportunity to try out StorMagic SvSAN in my home lab to see how it stacks up. The following is an introduction to SvSAN, a description of the deployment, testing, testing results and my findings. 



What is StorMagic SvSAN 6.2?

StorMagic SvSAN provides a Hyperconverged solution that has been designed with the remote office/branch office in mind. Two host nodes with onboard storage can be utilized in a shared storage style deployment in locations where a traditional 3 tiered architecture would prove to be difficult to manage or too cost prohibitive.  SvSAN is vendor agnostic so it can be deployed onto existing infrastructure without the need to acquire additional hardware. The two storage nodes can scale out to support up to 64 compute-only nodes. Licensing is straight forward: perpetual license per pair of clustered storage nodes as one license per pair. Initial pricing is also very accessible, starting at approximately $4,000 for the first 2TB license. Licensing and capacity can scale beyond the initial 2TB.



When asked about their typical customer base, StorMagic provided the following response: "StorMagic SvSAN is designed for large organizations with thousands of sites and companies running small data centers that require a highly available, two-server solution that is simple, cost-effective and flexible. Our typical customers have distributed IT operations in locations like retail stores, branch offices, factories, warehouses and even wind farms and oil rigs. It is also perfect for IoT projects that require a small IT footprint, and the uptime and performance necessary to process large amounts of data at the edge."



Technical Layout of SvSAN

A typical SvSAN deployment consists of the following base components: hypervisor integration, Virtual Storage Appliances, Neutral Storage Host. In my lab environment, I used VMware vSphere, but StorMagic does offer support for Hyper-V as well. A plugin is loaded into the vCenter Server and provides the dashboard for management and deploying the VSAs. Following the wizard, a Virtual Storage Appliance is deployed on each host and the local storage is presented to the VSA. Before creating storage pools the witness service (Neutral Storage Host) must be deployed external to the StorMagic cluster. The NSH can be deployed on a server, Windows PC, or Linux. It is light weight enough that it can run on a Raspberry Pi.



SvSAN 6.2 introduced the ability to encrypt data. A key management server is required for encryption. For this evaluation, I installed Fornetix Key Orchestration as the KMS. Encryption options available include encryption of a new datastore, encryption of an existing datastore, re-keying a datastore, and decrypting the datastore. As I was curious to as what kind of performance hit encryption may have against the environment, I ran my tests against the non-encrypted datastore, then again after encrypting it.



Deployment and Testing

The overall installation process is fairly straight forward. StorMagic provides an Evaluators guide which outlines the installation process, and their website has ample documentation for the product. I had to read through the documentation a couple of times to fully understand the nuances of the deployment. I did encounter a few hiccups during deployment, one IP issue which I resolved and a timeout on the VSA deployment. I did need to contact support to release the license for the Virtual Storage Appliance which timed out, but support was responsive and resolved my issue quickly. The timeout may have been tied to the IP issue as the VSA deployed successfully on the second attempt.



With the underlying infrastructure in place, a shared datastore was deployed across both host nodes. Now the testing could begin. A Windows Server 2012 R2 virtual machine was deployed on the SvSAN datastore to run performance testing against. The provided Evaluation Guide gives many suggested tests to put the SvSAN environment through its paces. As I mentioned previously, I ran the tests against an encrypted datastore, a non-encrypted datastore, and a local datastore.



Following the guidelines set forth by the Evaluation Guide, Iometer was the tool of choice for performance benchmarking. Below is a chart of the metrics used. Outside of the suggested performance testing I also ran various tests to see what the end user experience could feel like on a SvSAN backed server. These tests included RDP session into the VM, continuously pinging locations internal and external to the network, and running various applications.






The final tests ran against the SvSAN cluster included failure scenarios and how it would impact the virtual machine. Drives were removed, connectivity to the Neutral Storage Host was severed, iSCSI & cluster networking were removed. An interesting aspect to the guide is that it gives you testing options to cause failures that will affect VMs running on the SvSAN datastore so you can see first-hand how the systems will handle the loss of storage.



SvSAN Results & Final Thoughts


Performance testing ran against the VM on the SvSAN datastore provided positive results. I was curious as to whether passing through an additional step in the process would affect IOPS, but there were only nominal differences between the local storage and the SvSAN datastore. I found the same to be true when it came to running an encrypted versus a non-encrypted datastore. IOPS performance held steady across all testing scenarios.



The same was true with the user experience performance testing. While running Iometer, Firefox, a popular chat application, and pinging a website the following failures were introduced to no impact:



  • hard drives were remove
  • a Virtual Storage Appliance was powered down
  • an ESXi host was shut down
  • Connectivity to the Neutral Storage host was severed



I was impressed with my experience with StorMagic's SvSAN. From no prior exposure to running production ready datastores in approximately an hour. The solution performed well under duress. Overall, StorMagic SvSAN is an excellent choice for those in need of a solid remote office/branch office solution that is reliable and cost effective.



Lab Technology Specifications:

  • Two Dell R710s
  • 24 GB RAM each
  • 2x X5570 Xeon 2.93 GHz 8M Cache, Turbo, HT, 1333MHz CPU Each
  • One 240 GB SSD drive for caching in each host
    • Presented as a single 240 GB pool from the RAID controller
  • 5 x 600 10k SAS drives configured in RAID 5
    • Presented as two pools; 400GB & 1.8 TB
  • VMware vCenter Server Appliance 6.5
  • VMware ESXi 6.5 U2 Dell Custom ISO
  • Cisco Meraki MS220 1GB Switching 

Further reading on StorMagic:
SvSAN Lets You Go Sans SAN 
 
This blog was originally published at Gestalt IT as a guest blog post. 

If you'd like to continue the conversation about vSphere upgrades, do not hesitate to contact me via any of the channels provided below. Do you have an idea or a topic for the blog? Would you like to be a guest on the ExploreVM podcast? If so, please contact me on Twitter, Email, or Facebook.

via Latest imported feed items on VMware Blogs https://ift.tt/2ve2yB7
RSS Feed

If New feed item from https://blogs.vmware.com/feed, then send me an email at kr

IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evernote cuts staff as user growth stalls

Image
Note-taking app Evernote has fallen on hard times of late, culminating in its latest spate of job cuts impacting 15 percent of its workforce (54 employees). CEO Chris O' Neil -- an ex-Googler who took the reins in 2015 -- announced the firings at an all-hands meeting earlier today, reports TechCrunch . In a message on the Evernote blog , O' Neill admitted he'd set "incredibly aggressive goals" for the company in 2018. He continued: "Going forward, we are streamlining certain functions, like sales, so we can continue to speed up and scale others, like product development and engineering." The layoffs follow an exec exodus just weeks ago and the company's recent brand refresh (complete with a refined logo and wordmark). But critics are more concerned about its product, especially the free tier, which they claim lacks the perks to...
Read more

The best air conditioner

Image
By Liam McCabe This post was done in partnership with Wirecutter . When readers choose to buy Wirecutter's independently chosen editorial picks, it may earn affiliate commissions that support its work. Read the full article here . After six summers of researching, testing, and recommending window air conditioners, we've learned that quiet and affordable ACs make most people the happiest—and we think the LG LW8016ER will fit the bill in most rooms. This 8,000 Btu unit cools as efficiently and effectively as any model with an equal Btu rating, and runs at a lower volume and deeper pitch than others at this price. Little extra features like a fresh-air vent, two-axis fan blades, and a removable drain plug help set it apart, too. The LG LW8016ER is a top choice for an office or den, and some people will find it quiet enough for a bedroom, too. If our main pic...
Read more

We won't see a 'universal' vape oil cartridge anytime soon

Image
Pre-loaded cartridges of cannabis concentrate are currently among the most popular means of consumption, and for good reason. They're discreet to use and easy to handle, a far cry from the dark days of 2016 when we had to dribble hash oil or load wax into narrow-mouthed vape pens by hand. But, frustratingly, an ever increasing number of oil cartridge manufacturers employ one-off design standards so that their products won't work with those of their competitors, thereby locking customers into proprietary ecosystems. We've already seen this with nicotine vaporizers -- which has a seen a massive rise in "pod systems" in the last few years, each outfitted with a unique canister and battery built to be incompatible with those of their competition. Is it too late for the burgeoning cannabis industry to set a universal standard for their product designs? ...
Read more